Who Do You Trust?
by Nicole Kellner-Swick
By Terrence R. Heffernan, Esq.
Delinquent loans obviously jeopardize the fiscal soundness of any creditor. Studies done by the Receivables Management Industry have demonstrated how the collectability of a past-due account decreases dramatically with the age of a delinquency. For example, one study determined that 61 days past due was the optimal time to place an account with a third party collector. The study’s research concluded that at 30 days delinquent, there was a 62% chance of recovery, while the recovery percentages decreased to 53% by day 60 of delinquency, 48% by day 90, 40% by day 180, 33% by day 270, and only 20% on accounts past-due for a one year period.
Lenders must therefore have an effective mechanism for resolving delinquent loans in a timely fashion. Even credit unions, which inherently place a premium on customer relations and personalized banking, may occasionally be forced to call upon outside collection assistance as a “necessary evil”. For any credit union, the decision to employ an outside collection agent is never an easy decision.
Anyone wrestling with the Hobson’s Choice between an ineffective in-house collection program versus the fear of employing an external collection program might take comfort from knowing that professional third-party collectors are not the unregulated, uncaring individuals often portrayed in the media. To the contrary, debt collectors must follow specific federal guidelines that establish consumers’ rights and collectors’ responsibilities. Examples are the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The majority of such federal laws also contain provisions requiring data security and confidentiality. In addition, individual state laws and regulations may impose requirements over the safekeeping of sensitive consumer information, including requirements that collectors inform consumers in the event of a security breach of consumer information. Specialized federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 impose additional standards to protect against the unauthorized access of consumer’s confidential information.
To dispel some of the myths regarding professional collection agents, it is not true that collectors continually hassle people who cannot pay. Apart from such conduct being both illegal and ineffective, professional collectors are trained to listen to what consumers have to say and thus determine if they indeed have the ability to pay the past-due account. The most effective collectors do not engage in intimidation. The professional collection agent is an able motivator and communicator. The best collectors work with people to get their accounts back into good standing.
Professional collectors do not force people into bankruptcy. Doing so is clearly counterproductive to the objectives of both the creditor and the collector; when people file for bankruptcy, their financial obligations are usually extinguished, which would result in the lender and the collection agent receiving very little or nothing. Good collectors know that people with financial problems often require assistance in resolving their accounts without expensive litigation, and many need the flexibility of alternative payment arrangements to work out their financial problems. While a collector’s job is to collect, in reality the job often includes counseling.
Another myth is that collectors deal mainly with the poor and the helpless. The reality is that professional collectors quickly grasp that debtors come from all levels of society. In fact, many debtors are like you and me, who for whatever reason are experiencing an unusual financial problem. Effective collectors know they must treat each person as an individual and with respect in order to understand each person’s specific situation.
If your Credit Union is experiencing difficulty in resolving delinquent accounts through your internal efforts, I hope this article may reduce apprehension of utilizing an external collection agent. As stated above, the longer an account is unpaid, the lower the possibility of repayment. Finding a collection agent who supports your fiscal strength and also preserves your community reputation should be a stress-free process. It’s only a matter of trust.
If you have any questions regarding this advisory, please contact Mr. Terrence R. Heffernan, Esq. Terry is a partner in the Legal Action Recovery department of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. in the Columbus office. He can be reached directly at 614-857-4390 or via e-mail at theffernan@weltman.com.
Wednesday at the GAC.
by Rob Rutkowski

On my last day at the conference, I decided to visit Credit Union House. This is a terrific resource for credit unions that need a place to plan and meet while in Washington D.C. They had an open house and I stopped by on my way home.

If you have a chance to attend a function there or better yet, hold an event there, I highly recommend it.

Business Development Specialist Maren McBride gave our group a tour and can assist anyone in making arrangements at Credit Union House. The contact information is available on their website.

The annex is also available and is quite beautiful.
It’s hard to summarize my experience this year at the GAC in so many words. Some of my friends who didn’t attend worried that things would be gloomy because of the economy and the regulatory environment. I can emphatically say it was just the opposite. There were a lot of optimistic people with the energy to face the challenges of the industry head on. I left the event more energized than when I arrived.
Tuesday at the GAC.
by Rob Rutkowski
For those of you who have not been to CUNA’s grand affair, I have to give you a sense of scope. The GAC is big! Have you ever seen an exhibit hall like this?

CUNA hired Elvis there to help spread the word. He looks pretty happy.
The general sessions of the GAC are also huge.

Today’s turn out was terrific. The speakers ranged from several Congressmen to Board Member Gigi Hyland to the still amazing Alan Greenspan. Here he is with Paul Berry (the very talented host of the general session):

Putting on a show of this size is nothing less than an epic production. CUNA does it like no one else. I didn’t observe any problems and I would have been surprised if I had. I don’t think I’ve ever seen any logistics issues in any of these conferences I’ve attended over the last 12 years. They are pros.
On my way out I encountered some friends.

Anthony Demangone, Carrie Hunt and B. Dan Berger. Anthony is NAFCU’s Director of Regulatory Compliance, Carrie is NAFCU’s General Counsel and Dan is Exec VP of Government Affairs. They were here for a meeting. While it lasts, the GAC is truly the center of the credit union world.
I also ran into some of the GAC Crashers that I talked about yesterday. Some of them are staying in a hostel, with 6 guys in a room. This makes me very glad for my hotel accomodations. All of them seemed to be in quite good spirits despite staying up late and getting up early. Ah to be young again.
There are break out sessions this afternoon and more functions tonight. I’m leaving tomorrow, but I’m hoping to do one more post covering this most excellent event.
Monday Morning at the 2010 CUNA GAC.
by Rob Rutkowski
The Credit Union National Association puts on a tremendous event every year in Washington, D.C. A few years ago they moved it from a hotel to the D.C. Convention Center.

It’s very impressive. There are so many people here, it’s inspiring and humbling. It really shows the power of the Credit Union Movement. Everyone who plays a role in credit unions is here. From employees to volunteers to regulators to vendors. Thousands and thousands of credit union people have converged on Washington to meet, discuss issues, and do business. There might be a little fun involved too. The energy created is palpable.
I had to take a couple of pictures of my friend Brent Dixon and his crew of under 30 folks.

Brent organized a “Crash the GAC” group of 20-somthings who were going to attend even though they couldn’t afford the registration fee. When CUNA heard about it, to its credit, all of the crashers were given free admission. This is wonderful in so many ways. The credit union movement needs young people to get involved and these folks are bright and committed.

Alas, I’ve aged out of the under 30 crowd a very long time ago. But I do admire their energy and enthusiasm.
I’m hoping to post more pictures and have more comments about my time in Washington, D.C. this year. It certainly is an awesome start to the conference.
Have Super Bowl Ads Jumped the Shark?
by Nicole Kellner-Swick
Today’s blog comes courtesy of Denise Wymore, owner of consulting service for cooperatives, Denise Wymore, LLC.
Have Super Bowl Ads Jumped the Shark?
26 years ago, Steve Jobs spent an enormous amount of money to advertise his tiny little venture during the Super Bowl. It was 1984. Director Ridley Scott (Blade Runner, Thelma & Louse) filmed a jogger representing Apple throwing a sledgehammer into a giant Big Brother image representing IBM – promising a populist shift in the future of personal computers. The ad only ran once.
No other ad has come close to the Monday water-cooler-hype created that Sunday. Can you even name the teams that were playing?*
Super Bowl ads quickly became another reason, and in some people’s books “the” reason to tune into the game. The problem? The cost to run a 30 second spot on the Super Bowl was astronomical and although the commercials were memorable, the sponsor? Not so much.
Can you name the brand behind these famous Super Bowl ads?
(1993) The Showdown with Larry Bird and Michael Jordan – they engage in a physics-defying hoops shooting showdown.
(2000) “Herding Cats” A Bonanza-like family of cat herders talk about life on the range.
(2003) Terry Tate: Office Linebacker. To boost productivity, a CEO recruits a linebacker to slam into a series of “Office Space”- style cubicle drones.
This year Pepsi announced it would not run ads during the Super Bowl but rather channel those resources towards social media efforts. What does that mean?
According to Frank Cooper, a Senior Vice President at Pepsico “The Super Bowl broadcast can be an amazing stage for advertisers if it aligns with their brand strategy. However brands should not blindly anchor themselves to history.”
Pepsi is preparing to launch a new cause-oriented marketing campaign early next year. The new campaign, called “The Pepsi Refresh Project,” is a long term, multi-million dollar grant program that will grant money to charitable causes proposed and selected by consumers using social media.
This year the Super Bowl shifted for the first time in decades. The game out-shined the commercials. The ads were, by most accounts, ridiculous, insulting, tired and stupid. Like Fonzie water skiing in his underwear to jump over a shark, it’s time to shut ‘er down.
Instead, we should all take a page from Pepsi’s new playbook. What’s your cause? You don’t need to advertise it with frogs, Betty White or talking babies – you need to live it and let your audience talk about it. The water cooler is now in your member’s hand (think Facebook, Twitter, and good old fashioned text message).
The lessons we need to learn from both Apple and Pepsi? Vision and commitment. The 1984 Apple ad was important because the vision was real. Where is the Apple brand today? Where’s IBM?
Pepsi understands that a long term commitment to a cause can do more for their brand than dumping $3 million on 30 seconds. They are committed to letting their customers market for them.
Who Dat?!
*ANSWER: LA Raiders and Washington
Bucks First Federal Credit Union knows social media.
by Rob Rutkowski

by Rob Rutkowski
So I’m driving to work (and dropping off my kids at school) this morning and I’m listening to podcasts. Cleveland only got a few inches of the great snowstorm that’s wreaking so much havoc across the country so the drive isn’t too bad. Anyway, I tuned into CU Watercooler (Liquid Lunch #10). I’m embarrassed to admit that I’ve only listened to the show one other time (my podcast listening is mostly limited to car time). Matt Davis and Tim McAlpine interviewed a young lady from Bucks First Federal Credit Union. Apparently Bucks First put together a video that has eclipsed Larrisa Walkiw’s credit union video in popularity.
This is nothing short of astounding as Larrisa’s video was groundbreaking. Matt and Tim said something about an outfit called Retton something or another put it together for them. I had never heard of it, so at the next stop light I googled it on my phone and found a whole bunch of listings about Mary Lou Retton. Then I googled Buck’s First and found the credit union’s website. I loved the fact that they have a Twitter link on the first page and I’m going to start following them. But I still couldn’t find the video.
I dropped my kids off at school and slid off to work. I knew I had to blog about this this morning and I couldn’t wait to watch the Bucks First video. I went to the CU Watercooler website and found that the company (comedy duo, ad agency, I’m not really sure) that did this for them is called Rhett & Link, not Retton Link and is apparently famous. Here’s a link to the Bucks First video. It is quite awesome.
Danger, Will Robinson!
by Nicole Kellner-Swick
Today’s blog comes courtesy of Robbie Wright, founder of CU Innovators, helping credit unions and CUSOs innovate and execute.
Danger, Will Robinson!
By: Robbie Wright
Corporate espionage and international cyber-wars sound like themes from the next John Grisham book, but these trends are becoming more and more commonplace as the perceived value of data stored on the Internet increases exponentially. In December, Google detected an incredibly sophisticated attack on their infrastructure and a number of other web companies that could have a dramatic impact on credit unions.
In these particular attacks, Google discovered that the hackers had been targeting assets of human rights activists. These assets included their Google Mail, or Gmail, account, email accounts at Yahoo, and other miscellaneous information from a variety of companies, including a few financial institutions. What makes these attacks slightly different is the broad spectrum of techniques that were employed to gain access to the data.
The techniques that were used to gain access to sensitive information are capable of bypassing many of the security mechanisms credit unions have in place both for internal controls and external access to member information. As is commonplace in many technology attacks, they begin with social engineering and capturing passwords.
In social engineering, an adversary attempts to gain privileged information from a target without the target realizing they have divulged anything of value. A common technique used by security audit firms, and bad guys alike, is to pretend to be a service representative sent by “IT” to perform maintenance on a server or computer at a branch. They may know the name of the Vice President or Director of IT, gleaned from LinkedIn, which would lend them credibility to a teller. In the case of this attack, they went after the social networking sites, email accounts, and instant messaging accounts of the friends of employees at companies who had access to privileged information. The hackers would then impersonate the friends of those employed at the target companies, hoping to increase their chances of success by getting the employees to click on a link to a malicious website.
In addition to the social engineering aspects of the attack, a previously unknown vulnerability in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer was also exploited. This bug enabled the hackers to run their malicious software on the victims’ computers, capturing passwords, emails, and other sensitive information.
While this attack does not represent an immediate threat to credit unions directly, the techniques that were employed during the hack should alarm every credit union IT manager, auditor, and security firm in the industry. Most credit union employees already know that strong passwords are a must. Recently, Twitter, the micro-blogging service, was the victim of an online attack which was enabled by weak password policies within the organization, security oversight on the part of some employees, and weaknesses in personal email accounts. It is vitally important that credit union staff have secure passwords. Those passwords need not be impossible to remember simply in the name of security.
These attacks did teach us valuable lessons that we can use to improve the security of our credit unions:
• Never underestimate the lengths of which someone is willing to go to gain access to sensitive information. Make yourself an undesirable target by having a thoroughly designed and tested security plan.
• All of the technology solutions in the world won’t be able to stop someone who has gained access to a user’s password. Enforce strong, but not impossible to remember, passwords on all systems in the credit union.
• Social engineering can and mostly likely will happen to all credit unions at some point. The only prevention against social engineering is education.
• Encourage your employees to maintain a security-conscious mindset at home, both physically and electronically.
City of Berea, Ohio, Takes Ordinance To A New Level
by Nicole Kellner-Swick February 8, 2010, 5:53 pm
Filed under:
credit unions,
mortgages | Tags:
abandoned properties,
City of Berea,
deteriorating houses,
mortgages,
Northeast Ohio,
Ohio,
real estate,
residential lending
City of Berea, Ohio, Takes “Burden The Lender For Abandoned Properties” To A New Level
By Larry R. Rothenberg, Esq.
February 2, 2010
The City of Berea, Ohio, has pushed the envelope to a new level with its recent adoption of a rigorous ordinance impacting mortgage holders. This continues the disturbing trend of Northeast Ohio cities acting heavy-handedly out of concern for their abandoned and deteriorating houses.
Beginning in 2006, two suburbs of Cleveland enacted ordinances requiring a foreclosing lender to register the property with the city’s building department and pay a registration fee (read: tax), of $60 or $75. The idea caught on, and a total of seven cities in Northeast Ohio adopted such ordinances. In view of the relatively small cost to comply, no lender has challenged the constitutionality of the ordinances.
In 2009, the City of East Cleveland went a step further by requiring mortgagees to obtain a license for a vacant residential building, regardless of whether a foreclosure has been filed. The city’s “vacated building maintenance standards” require that the building be well-kept by the mortgagee, and adequately protected from intrusion by trespassers, and from deterioration by weather. The non-refundable annual registration fee is $500. The failure to register a vacant house or building or to pay the fees within 30 days after they become due is a first degree misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $500 to $1,000 per violation, and is also punishable by up to six months in jail. Late fees may be assessed equal to the license or renewal fee, or $1,000, whichever is less.
The City of Berea, which already had an ordinance requiring registration of foreclosures, now has a new ordinance intensifying the responsibility imposed on the mortgage holder. Berea’s ordinance applies to all vacant residential properties that are either in foreclosure, or have become REO’s through either a sheriff’s sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, and applies to junior mortgage holders as well as first mortgagees. The ordinance imposes the following requirements on the foreclosing entity:
- The foreclosing entity must perform an inspection of any residential real property prior to filing a foreclosure action or accepting a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or within 10 days after buying the property at a sheriff’s sale
- If the inspection shows that the property is vacant, the foreclosing entity must submit an application to register the property as abandoned within 10 days of the inspection, and pay a registration fee of $50 and an inspection fee of $100
- Once a completed application is submitted and all fees have been paid, the City’s Building Department shall conduct an exterior and interior inspection to ensure compliance with the City’s zoning and maintenance codes, and shall forward a list of violations as well as a timeframe to cure the violations to the foreclosing entity
- If the foreclosing entity’s inspection shows that the property is occupied, the foreclosing entity must perform additional inspections every 30 days to determine whether the property is still occupied, and if the property has become vacant, must register the property as abandoned and pay the registration and inspection fees
- If the property remains vacant for six months, another application and $50 registration fee must be paid
- Real properties required to be registered must be kept free of grass and weeds in excess of six inches, debris or trash, graffiti, etc.
- Doors and windows must be maintained and kept secure
- For properties required to be registered, if the foreclosing entity is “out of the area,” it must arrange for weekly interior and exterior inspections and submit reports to the building department, install a sign indicating the contact information for the foreclosing entity and the property management company, and if the property is not in compliance with the zoning or maintenance codes, cure the violations within 72 hours of notice
- In addition to the standards established by the zoning and maintenance codes, and any other enforcement remedies permitted under the law, the chief building officer may require the foreclosing entity to implement additional maintenance or security measures including but not limited to securing any and all door, window or other openings, installing additional security lighting, increasing on-site inspection frequency, employment of an on-site security guard or other measures as may be reasonably required to arrest the decline of the property
- Violations shall be treated as strict liability offenses regardless of intent, and are subject to a fine of up to $1,000 per offense, with each day the violation occurs or continuing to occur deemed to be a separate offense
While the ordinances enacted by the other cities raise constitutionality concerns, Berea’s ordinance raises an even more pronounced concern. Cities are understandably troubled about vacant and deteriorating foreclosure properties. Although property owners are not absolved from their responsibility, the cities are focusing the accountability and the significant costs for building code compliance on the lenders.
More copycat ordinances can be expected, unless lenders step forward to challenge their constitutionality. If your organization desires to do so, or if you have any questions regarding this advisory, please contact Larry Rothenberg directly at 216-685-1135 or via e-mail at lrothenberg@weltman.com, to discuss.
For a complete copy of Berea’s ordinance, go here.
Larry is the partner-in-charge of the Cleveland real estate and foreclosure department of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. He is the author of the Ohio Jurisdictional Section contained within the treatise, “The Law of Distressed Real Estate”, published by The West Group. The firm handles foreclosures and related litigation throughout Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Larry can be reached at (216) 685-1135 or via email at lrothenberg@weltman.com.